Mike Lee hits some roadblocks

>> Bryan Schott: Until Monday. This is Barry, uh, Champlain

reminding you that sticks and stones

can break your bones, but words cause

permanent damage.

Hey there, and welcome to Special Session. I'm Bryan Schott.

This is the show where a surly, longtime Utah

journalist. That's me. Breaks down the important political news

of the last week and helps you understand the story and what

it all means.

I think the most obvious place to start this week is with the latest

developments with Senator Mike Lee's plan to sell off

millions of acres of public lands. That idea,

that proposal of his, hit a couple of roadblocks

this week, and he may not be able to

overcome them. If you'll remember, Senator Lee added a

provision to the one big beautiful bill, as

President Donald Trump calls it, that could have put

nearly 3 million acres of Forest Service

and Bureau of Land Management lands on the auction

block. Now, some analyses said that up to

250 million acres of land in 11 west

western states could potentially be up for sale.

Earlier this week, the Senate parliamentarian ruled

that the idea violated what they call the Byrd Rule. And

I'm gonna help you understand what that means. This massive

tax and spending bill is making its way through Congress as a

reconciliation bill, and that means it only needs

a simple majority to pass. The Senate

Democrats can't filibuster the bill, which means

that Republicans would need 60 votes to

overcome a filibuster, which they clearly don't have.

But when it's a reconciliation bill,

they. A simple majority.

Reconciliation was created as part of the

Congressional Budget act of 1974, and

that allows Congress to consider tax,

spending and debt limit legislation

in an expedited basis with no

filibuster. They've used it 22 times since

1974. It most recently has been

used when the same party has control of the

White House, the House of Representatives, and Senate. But

they don't have 60 votes in the Senate. So this is a way

to push budget priorities through

without having to overcome a

filibuster. Reconciliation can only be used

on very specific

issues. For one, they can use it to

address mandatory spending on entitlement

programs like Medicaid, Medicare. However, Social

Security is specifically exempted from the

process. There's part of reconciliation called

the Byrd Rule, and that is named after

the late Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia.

What it does is allow senators to block

extraneous provisions. They can

raise an objection and nick something

that does not specifically address

changes to the budget. So when you're

pushing legislation through

reconciliation, it has to be

budget related. The Senate parliamentarian

Is who acts as a referee when it comes to

reconciliation. They get to decide what's in

or out when an objection is raised.

Their decisions are not 100% binding. Senators

can vote to override the

parliamentarians decisions, but for the most part,

they abide by whatever they decide

when it comes to reconciliation. And

senator Lee's proposal to sell

millions of acres of public land was

ruled as an extraneous issue. It was kicked out

of the bill. Now, right before Democrats in the

senate announced that Lee's land sale had been

excluded from the bill, he took to social

media and said he was going to revise his

plan due to feedback from the hunting and

fishing community and others. Clearly,

he was trying to get ahead of the story that what he was trying to do

was not allowed. So he said he's going to be

proposing these changes. And then we found out what those changes

were a couple of days later. His revised plan removes

forest service lands from the bill, but it keeps blm

land in, and it still mandates the sale

of anywhere between 600,000 and 1.2

million acres of BLM land.

Lee is pushing this entire idea as a solution

to the housing crisis. Open up land where

people and build houses, because it's hard to find a

house in the western United States. And his

revised proposal does clarify

that any land that is sold must be used for

housing or housing purposes. And he specifies that

any land sold, any of this blm land that's sold must be

within five miles of a population

boundary. But the senate parliamentarian's decision is not

his only problem. The other is that there's

a lot of people opposed to this idea. They

don't like the idea of selling off

America's public, public lands. Critics say

this is just Lee trying once again

to shrink how much land the federal

government owns. The feds do own more than half

of the land in Utah, Nevada, Idaho and Alaska.

And in fact, they own 67% of the land

here in Utah, which is something that Utah leaders

don't like. Remember, the legislature

tried to sue to take control of some of

those lands from the federal government, and the supreme court

turned that lawsuit away. So

conservation and environmental groups absolutely

hate this idea. They think it is terrible. But they're not the

only ones. So do his fellow Republicans in

Congress. Montana Republican senator Steve

Dane said on Thursday that he's confident that this

provision, the revised provision, will not

survive the reconciliation process.

It'll be kicked out as extraneous. And even if it does,

he says he has enough votes in the senate to Kill it. Over in the

House, Representative Ryan Zinke, who served as the

Secretary of Interior in the first Trump administration,

he got this provision stripped out of the House

version of this bill. You remember Representative Celeste

Malloy tacked it in at the last minute,

and it would have sold up to 500,000 acres

of publicly owned land in the West.

Zinke got that stripped out. It's back in now.

And he said he would vote against the bill if Lee's land sale

provision remained intact. Now, we still don't

know of, as of this recording, whether this idea will

pass muster with the Senate

parliamentarian. My guess is it probably

won't because there are already existing

laws on the books governing the sale of public lands,

and this issue does circumvent

that, which is kind of one of the definitions

of what is an extraneous issue under the Byrd

rule. And that's the reason why Lee is trying to put

this in the reconciliation package. He

knows he would not be able to get a standalone

bill through the regular process. He

will not get 60 votes in the Senate. That would not happen at

all. And I think it would be a really heavy lift in the

House. He knows there's no way he could get

this passed through the regular process. And so he

wants to use the reconciliation process as an

end run around that to try and accomplish

something he's been wanting to do for years. And

why would he want to do that? Lee gets a lot of

campaign money from the real estate and the oil

and gas sectors, industries that might

be just a little more than interested in

the sale of public lands in the Western United States.

According to open secrets, between 2019 and

2024, Lee and his

affiliated PACs got

$677,000

from political action committees and individuals

related to the real estate industry, and

$456,000 into campaign

donations from the oil and gas

industry. So Lee has to overcome a whole bunch of

roadblocks in order to even get this provision

included in the reconciliation package,

not to mention getting in the

Senate and in the House. But the good news for

Lee is that it gets his ha, ha

funny social media posts about the assassination of

a Democratic Minnesota lawmaker and the

attempted assassination of another one out

of the news. By the way, he still hasn't

apologized for that, but we're moving on, and

everybody's now focused on what he's trying to do

with the public land sale.

By the way, the parliamentarian also nixed another

provision from the reconciliation bill that

is championed by member

of Congress from Utah On Friday,

the parliamentarian ruled out a

provision that created a nationwide school

vouchers program based on legislation pushed by

Representative Burgess Owens. And the provision and

reconciliation sought to enact a permanent

tax credit for individuals who donate

to organizations that support educational

expenses, including private school tuition. So if you

make a donation to one of these organizations,

you can claim a tax write off. So that

provision is out. Lease, public land sale is out,

probably will get nixed if it gets back

in, which is highly doubtful, but

who knows? The Senate is hoping to get this

bill passed sometime before July

4th, but now they're starting to waver on that. They may

not make it by the July 4th break, but there's a lot

of time between now and then, so anything can happen.

Stay tuned.

We're still trying to untangle what happened at, uh, the

no Kings rally in Salt Lake Lake City during that

March on June 14th. An armed volunteer

says that he saw a person with a rifle, detected a

threat, pulled out his weapon and fired. The person who had the

rifle, Arturo Gamboa, was hit, as

was Arthur Falasa Alou, who later died.

Gamboa was initially arrested by the Salt Lake City

police on suspicion of murder. Even though he did not fire his

weapon. He was released late last week after his

lawyers challenged the legality of his detention. The

investigation is still ongoing. The armed volunteer who

allegedly fired his weapon has not been named

publicly by officials and no charges have

been filed. There are also some other things that really

don't make sense about this whole situation.

I did some digging this week, and what, uh, I found

raises even more questions. The protest was

put on by a group called Utah 50

51. And that is an organization

that is loosely affiliated with the national

50:51 movement. They're not directly

AFFILIA affiliated. It's. It's a really loose

connection. It's not like the national organization

coordinates directly with the local

group. They're autonomous from each other,

so that's why they're loosely affiliated. The national movement actually cut

ties with the Utah group after the

shooting because the Utah group had armed

volunteers there, and that violates the

values of the national movement. I

got a hold of a copy of the application

for the protest for the event that was

filed with Salt Lake City. And it wasn't

Utah 5051 that was listed

as the group that was organizing this

event. It was a company called

Utah Protest and Rally llc.

That company is not a Utah company. It was

registered in Wyoming in April.

Essentially, it's a shell company. The paperwork filed

with The Wyoming Secretary of State

revealed an address at a

virtual office in a strip mall in

Sheridan, Wyoming, home to nearly 4,000

other shell companies, including companies that

are related to some of the money making ventures for

Donald Trump and his family. The company that does the Trump watch

is headquartered at that exact same address. So

is the company that does Trump's gold sneakers.

Wyoming laws are very conducive for the

creation of these anonymous shell

companies. There's not a lot of information the state

requires you to fil them. Over the past

couple of years, Wyoming has overtaken Delaware as the

place where people incorporate their

LLCs because they can do it anonymously.

Trying to find the people behind this company was

a dead end. There was some information on

the paperwork filed with the state that

listed the agent, the company that

helped them form this llc,

which is pretty much the only thing that's required. I

reached out to that company, but they made it known in

no uncertain terms that they had nothing to

do with this Utah Protest and Rally

llc. They also said they would not forward

any communications. They would not help me try to get in touch

with the people behind this company. So it was pretty much

a dead end. Also listed on the permit

as the organizer, as the local point

of contact, is a person by the name of

Michael Andaman. This person

appears to be a ghost. In fact, the

only presence for a Michael

Andaman linked to Utah is a

LinkedIn profile that is essentially brand new.

It was created sometime in the last month.

I can't tell whether or not it was created before

the M. June 14th protest or afterwards.

There's no profile picture. The only work

history it has on it is it lists

this person as an investor in some

company called Andaman Holdings.

When I looked up Andaman Holdings, I found a few of them

in other states, but really could not link anyone

named Michael Andaman to any of these

companies. So this person appears to be a ghost. It is

extremely weird. So you have a shell company

in Wyoming that I can't get any information

about and can't get a hold of the people in charge of

it. And you have a gentleman by the name of Michael

Andaman listed on this permit as the

organizer. And there's really no

indication whether or not this person exists.

And if this is a fictitious person using the

last name Andaman, that's really kind of a

terrible joke if you think about it. There are also some

questions that still remain about the use of these

armed volunteer peacekeepers. It appears

that local law enforcement was unaware

that they were going to be There on the permit

application for a, uh, demonstration that you have to file

with the city, it asks whether

organizers plan to hire private

security for the event or hire off

duty Salt Lake City police officers. The

person who filled it out chose none

and there is no option for the

use of private security, which is

what these volunteer peacekeepers would have been. There's no

option and there's no way to inform the police. I

asked the Salt Lake City police whether or not they were told

that there would be armed volunteers at this

event and they said no.

They said they had an awareness that event organizers

were going to have people on hand to help

facilitate the march, but they were not

classified as security. So there

are still a ton of questions

about this that remain unanswered.

I know the investigation is ongoing, but this is

really strange that the organizers

are using a, uh, shell company in Wyoming and

the group appears to be headed by a person

who may or may not exist.

Well, here we go again. In a repeat of what he

did back in 2021, Governor Spencer Cox

has declared June 29th. That's

this coming Sunday. I'm, uh, recording this on Friday, so

you may be already past this, but Sunday, June 29, as

a statewide day of prayer and fasting

for rain because Utah's in the

midst of a pretty bad drought. In fact, drought conditions

across the state have increased by more than

80% since earlier in this month. We've had three

hundred and eighty wildfires across the state this year

and it's, it's, it's not good, people. If

you look at the weather outlook, there's very little chance

of rain over the next few weeks and we've got

July 4th coming up. So people are going to be

shooting off fireworks which could make

the fire situation worse. Cox did

this back in 2021. And I don't know if you remember this.

Comedian John Oliver on his HBO show

last week tonight just

absolutely roasted Cox

for his declaration. He was

criticizing Utah's overuse of water

and then he lit into Cox for his call

for prayer to solve the situation.

>> Speaker B: And, and while Utah has recently passed

some new laws encouraging conservation, they've also

been pursuing a billion dollar pipeline to bring in what

some in Utah insist is additional surplus water

from Lake Powell, a surplus that anyone who so

much as looks at that lake would know simply does

not exist. And I know that that seems

wildly irresponsible on Utah's part. And that is because

it is. Though to be fair, it is still not the

worst idea they've had because just Watch this video

from the governor of Utah in response to drought

conditions there just last year.

>> Speaker C: We need more rain, and we need it now. We

need some divine intervention. That's why

I'm asking Utahns of all faiths to join

me in a Weekend of Prayer, June 4th through

the 6th. By praying collaboratively

and collectively asking God or whatever

higher power you believe in for more rain,

we may be able to escape the deadliest aspects of the

continuing drought.

>> Speaker D: Wow.

>> Speaker B: You know Utah is desperate when they are

to join in a prayer. I'm asking you tarns

of all faiths, whether that's the Mormon one or one of the many

wrong ones, to collectively pray to the

Christian God and the false deities. The rest of you worship

for more reign so that we can solve this crisis before

those of you who have not accepted Jesus Christ into your hearts

burn in the fires of eternal hell.

>> Bryan Schott: At the end of the segment, God, played by actor

Bryan Cox, showed up and he tore into

Cox just to drive the point home.

>> Speaker B: So let's hope those states get to work in the next two months and come

up with a decent plan, because we desperately need

to prepare for a much drier future in the

American west and do it more equitably this

time, because it is imperative that we learn from our

past mistakes. And for anyone who still

thinks that this is something we can just pray our way

out of, I actually have a special message

from a very special guest.

>> Speaker D: Hi, it's me.

>> Bryan Schott: God.

>> Speaker D: I know I don't often do this, but I just wanted to

appear in person to make one thing

perfectly clear. You

can't pray your way out of a drought.

Frankly, I'm insulted you even asked me.

You got yourself in this mess. Get

yourself the out of it. I gave

you plenty of water. It's not my fault you wasted

it building surfing lagoons and golf courses

in the middle of a desert

Utah.

Your capital is Salt Lake

City. It's next to a small

salt lake. A lake of

salt. Take the

hint. So, no, I

will not be answering your prayer for rain.

The point is, I want

humans of all faiths to come

together and act like rational

adults when it comes to water use.

Heed my words, my children, and

conserve the once bountiful gifts of rivers

and lakes which I created for you

on Earth.

Now.

>> Bryan Schott: Off. I know that that

really got under Cox's skin. And you could tell because

he and Lieutenant Governor Deidre Henderson, when

they would show up at Republican events, they would

specifically point out how they were mocked by the liberal media

for calling for prayers for rain.

Now everybody looks stupid. So they were taking a victory lap,

but you could tell that ribbing by Oliver

really got under his skin. This will be the third

time that Cox will call for a statewide day of

prayer in 2023. He did it as a thank you

for all of the record breaking moisture we had

in the previous winter. I'm not trying to criticize

Cox's call for prayer to solve the problem, but

you kind of think that maybe it's going to take

a little bit more than that. I mean, we're in the middle

of a mega drought. This is

driest multi decade period

the southwestern United States has seen

since the year 800. Scientists

are saying this is the driest as it's

ever been. And climate models show that

drier conditions will continue

in this area through the end of the 21st

century at least. So buckle up. It's going to be

really dry and it's only going to get drier. And I, uh, think

aren't really expected to improve. So calling for a

statewide day of prayer is doing something.

But also, you know, God helps those

who help themselves. So maybe we should be

praying that state leaders take a little more initiative,

don't you think?

That'll do it for this week? Hey, do me a favor.

Subscribe if you haven't already ready for to this podcast

and rate and review it wherever you can that

helps us grow our audience. You can also

leave a comment on this post or send me

an email with your questions. Or if there's a story

you'd like me to talk about on the show. You'll find my email in the

Show Notes. And if you'd like to

sponsor this show, you can also use that same

email to send me a message. Also, I'd like to ask you to take

a moment and subscribe to my newsletter, you Utah Political

Watch News, if you don't already. It's

free, but you can also support my work as an

independent journalist by becoming a paying

subscriber for as little as $5 a month. And you'll get some

extra stuff, including the Morning News Brief, which is

a subscriber only newsletter that I sent out

every morning with the top political stories of the day. It

helps you get up to speed before you head out the door. I

read the Internet so you don't have to. You'll also get access to

access to our subscriber only Discord, where we discuss

what's happening in Utah politics. And I'll send you some

Utah Political Watch stickers. M You can get all of that for as

little as $5 a month. Thank you so much for listening. I

really appreciate it. We'll be back with another episode next week.

Mike Lee hits some roadblocks
Broadcast by