320,000 is a LOT of signatures

>> Bryan Schott: And we're going to sing an original song that interestingly enough, was

written by no one. Hit it.

This is Special Session and I'm your host, Bryan

Schott of Utah Political Watch. I

have to apologize. There was no episode

last week. I'm sorry for that. I was

waylaid by my lawsuit against the

Utah State legislature for denying me

a press pass last week. Two legislative staff

are had to sit for sworn

depositions in the case. I did the same thing last

month for my deposition. I can't really talk about what happened

in the deposition just yet, but I will say

that some of the answers that they provided

were kind of eyebrow raising. I'll

talk about it as soon as I can, but I can't just yet.

That's what they call in the business, a tease. I

did get a nice note from one of the listeners that I want to share here, sort of a

testimony, if you will. And I won't identify

them by name, but they write, driving to Snow Basin this morning

with my 8 year old. And I told her we're going to listen to

a political podcast as we drove. She said, not

the Hinckley Report, it's so dry. He replied,

no, it's the Bryan Schott one. And she replied, oh, good,

he's funny. So, uh,

this podcast eight year old approved.

If you have nice things to say to me or want to drop me some

hate mail, you'll find my email in the show notes. Feel free to reach out

anytime. I'd love to hear from you.

Okay, enough of that stuff. Let's get to the news stories from the last

week.

320,000 is a big number,

especially when you're gathering signatures. The

coalition of labor unions known as Protect

Utah Workers, they needed to get 140,000

signatures, just a little bit more than 140,000

signatures statewide in order to put the

referendum to overturn the union busting bill

on the ballot. And this week they turned in

320,000 signatures.

Now, that doesn't mean all of them are going to count. They have to be

verified by local county clerks.

Everyone has to be a registered voter and the

signatures need to match. But that

320,000 number is a

big number. They also have a couple of other thresholds

they have to hit in order to make sure that they get on the ballot.

They have to get signatures from 8% of

voters in 15 of the state's 29

Senate districts. That's a pretty high threshold to meet. And the

reason lawmakers say they did it is to

make sure that support for

overturning a law through a referendum

has a broad support across the state. But

the real reason they did it is because that's a very, very hard thing

to do and it makes it harder to put a referendum

on the ballot. So the signatures all

have to be verified by the county clerks and the

lieutenant governor and then everyone who signed the

petition, all of those valid signatures, their names are going to be

put online and we'll see an effort, uh, probably

a well funded effort to people

to take their name off of the petition

to a signature rescission effort. Uh,

it's happened before, but it wasn't really for a

referendum. It was more for a ballot

Initiative Back in 2018,

the Count My Vote ballot initiative, which would have gotten

rid of Utah's caucus convention system. They

qualified for the ballot, they got enough signatures for the

ballot, but opponents had a rescission effort

and they were able to get enough people to remove

their signatures from the ballot in

a couple of senate districts in order to

make it so it didn't qualify. So this is not out

of the woods yet, but that 320,000

is still a very big number.

And it sends a message to

Utah lawmakers that shows

wide opposition to the law

that they passed, which was HB267. And

that bill, if you'll remember, the union busting

bill, it removed or eliminated the

right of public workers in the state to

collectively bargain for wages and working

conditions. Uh, they did all public

workers, although the main target was the Utah

Education association and was retribution for their

opposition to amendment A,

uh, which would have changed the way that schools are funded in the state,

changed the constitutional earmark for school funding

and for their lawsuit challenging the school vouchers

program. Program or the Utah Fits all scholarship, that was the

main target. But they included all public employees

into this bill. And if you remember, there was

massive opposition to this bill during the

session. Union showed up for the committee hearings

and when it was up on the floor and there was a

compromise in the works, but at the last second

it fell apart. And I talked about this before, one of the

reasons why is that unions

had agreed to take a neutral position on the

compromise, but their members kept calling,

leaving emails and calling lawmakers and they just

didn't want to hear it. They did not like the outrage that was coming their way

over this legislation. So they decided to ditch the

compromise and pass the bill in its original form. But they

didn't get 2/3 in both the House and the Senate, which

leaves it open for a Referendum. So that's where we're at.

How much did it cost to get this on the ballot? Well, almost

$3 million so far. I went and looked

at some of the donations and national unions, local

unions poured in as of last week,

2.6 million, doll.

The effort. Now some of that was through in

kind donations, but a lot of union workers

from outside of Utah joined the effort. The

national education association and 13 different

state level teachers unions sent people here

to work or provided remote assistance from

staffers. They traveled from Hawaii,

Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland.

The National Education association is the biggest

contributor to the referendum push. They donated more

than $1.8 million to this.

And that was as of last week. I haven't looked at the latest updated

numbers. 1.5 million of that went directly

to the signature effort. They did a

$500,000 down payment for the

professional signature gathering firm to go out and

get these signatures and then the balance was just a little

over a million dollars. Other national unions

kicked in some money as well. The, uh, American Federation

of State, county and Municipal employees, known as AFSCME,

they put in $250,000. It was

$10,000 from the International Brotherhood of Electric

Workers. Lot of branches of the Utah Education

association get involved with

time and some donations. And then there were

other, uh, unions that got involved. But this is not

over yet. Now that the signatures have been

gathered, then the effort to try and

invalidate or remove enough of those signatures

to keep this from qualifying is underway. So

we're not out of the woods yet, but

320,000 signatures is a

significant number. They think that may be the highest number of

signatures ever gathered for a referendum.

And they're probably right.

There was a really interesting economic juxtaposition

earlier this week. Lawmakers, legislative

leaders, Governor Spencer Cox had a big press

conference to celebrate the fact that they were

named the state with the best economic

outlook for the 18th straight year.

That ranking came from the American Legislative Exchange

Council, also known as alec. ALEC is one of

the most influential conservative groups in the

country. One of the things that they do, if you're unfamiliar with

this group, is they create model

legislation that lawmakers then

run in their home legislatures

around the country. In fact, in 2019 there was

an investigation by a number of news

outlets and they found out that at least 10,000

bills, uh, were copied from ALEC's

model legislation were introduced

nationwide over an eight year period

and more than 2,100 of those were

signed into law. And that happens here all the time.

Utah, there's big supporters of alec,

Senate President Stuart Adams is on

their board of directors. They had their annual meeting

here in Utah back in the summer of

2021. So the ranking came in

their rich States, poor states

report. And Utah had the best economic

outlook for the 18th straight

year. And this, this best economic outlook, it's

what's best for businesses. Okay, you need

that. ALEC is very pro business. Um,

one of the reasons why is that Utah's minimum wage is at the

federal minimum wage, which is

$7.25 an hour.

Utah is a right to work state, meaning that workers

cannot be required to join a union

as part of their employment or

as a requirement for employment. In fact, ALEC

praised the union busting bill

HB267 that lawmakers

passed earlier this year. We just talked about it as part

of the referendum effort. So those are some of the reason

why Utah is ranked so high as the best

economic outlook. But at that very same event, Governor Spencer

Cox, uh, said that he has instructed

state agencies to start planning for

a possible recession, uh, in case there is

an economic downturn. And why is that? Well,

it's because of President, uh, Donald Trump's tariffs

that came on Liberation Day that have just thrown

the market and the world

economy into chaos right now.

Now, Cox did not say that those tariffs were one of the reasons

they were looking at a recession. But if you look at all of the economic

indicators and the predictions, you see the big

banks, you see JP Morgan, you see

Chase, they're all raising their

forecast for a possible recession to

60%, 70%. And the only reason why

that number keeps going up is because of President

Donald Trump's tariffs. You really have to wonder whether

lawmakers were wise to push ahead

with another tax cut this year

that mostly benefits the top

income earners in the state. They reduced

Utah's income tax rate by

0.5%. I've told you about this before.

Study after study after study shows that most

of the money that is used to pay for those tax

cuts goes to the top

20%, the top 1%, really, of

income earners in the state. While those at the middle

and the bottom, they see maybe 8 to

$12 a month in tax

cuts. And those tax cuts are probably another reason

why al really, really high on

Utah's economy. But if we do hit a recession,

you're going to have to wonder whether or not that was the

best move, whether it was wise. You hear

lawmakers all the time talking about how Utah is the best

managed state in the union. If we have to have a special

session and start Cutting budgets. A lot of people

are going to be pointing at that tax cut, whether fair or not,

and saying, was that really the best thing

to do? Because you have to remember that income

taxes can only pay for public education,

higher education, and social services. And there

are mechanisms in place to make sure that

if there are any cuts to the education budget, it will

be very, very minimal. There are a number of rainy day

accounts and other protected accounts for

public education. So I don't know if schools are really

going to feel it. And that tax cut,

you know, criticism of that, if there's an economic

downturn, I don't know if that will be a fair criticism. What

will happen in the long run, though, is

if we have an economic downturn or a recession

and you start to see unemployment go

well, that's going to hurt people's ability to pay

income taxes. And if income tax collections go

down, then you can start to criticize the tax

cut, because as I said before, income taxes pay

for education in the state for the most part. And so

if you see those income tax collections start to

drop because the economy turns sour, then

you can point at those tax cuts and say, was that really

the best thing to do? But until that happens, it's not

really a fair criticism.

I reported on Thursday that

Utah freshman Congressman Mike Kennedy was

part of a Republican congressional delegation that

visited El Salvador and the notorious

seacot prison where the Maryland man

who was wrongfully deported

is being held. And that visit came just one day

before Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen visited the

country and was blocked from trying to meet with

Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Nobody knows

if he alive or not. The Trump

administration has been ordered to facilitate

his return by the Supreme Court, but

they're refusing, arguing that he has

alleged ties to criminal gangs, although

there's really not a lot of proof to support that

contention. I reached out to Kennedy's office

to get comment or chat with him about the visit.

They did not return those

requests, but I did find a picture of him online

along with the rest of the US Delegation meeting

at the US Embassy in El Salvador, Salvador. This

is the same trip. And I don't know if you saw these pictures,

but this is the same trip where one of the

other people involved in it. That's, uh,

Republican Representative Riley Moore from

West Virginia. He posted selfies from inside

the seacot prison, giving the double

thumbs up pose, uh, in front of these

cells filled with hundreds of

inmates. The brutal conditions for

prisoners inside of Seekot has earned it

the nickname of hell on Earth. The

that holds up to 40,000 prisoners

and there are reports that they're

looking to double that capacity. This

is a really, really brutal prison. And there is at least one

person from America, Kilmar Abrego Garcia,

who came to this country fleeing gangs who wanted to kill him. He

was given protected status, but the Trump administration

deported him in what they admit was a clerical

error. And he. But even though they say it was a mistake,

they're refusing to do anything to return him

to the United States or get him out of that prison. But at least

one Utah member of Congress, Representative Mike

Kennedy, has been inside seacot, and as of

Thursday afternoon, he's not

talking about it yet.

It could be something, it could be nothing. But it did

make me scratch my head a little bit.

I reported this week that former Utah

representative and now Fox News host Jason Chaffetz,

ah, took the remaining $130,000 he had

in his federal leadership pack and

moved it into a state level pack.

His federal pack was called American Victory

and he moved all that money into the Utah

Victory pack. Chaffetz's reasoning behind

the move is that it's simply a cost cutting

measure. He has to file financial disclosures both

for the federal pack and for the local

pac. And moving it all into one pack

makes some sense because then he only has to file one thing and pay

accountants, one organization. But

there are some advantages for him to do this and a few

drawbacks as well. But the timing is really, really

interesting because his federal PAC

has not taken in any money since 2020.

It's really done nothing. All he's done through it is

spent money on compliance, making

sure that his reports are filed correctly, accountants,

and then he's paying one of his former staffers, uh, for some

communications work. So the cost cutting thing there makes some

sense. The shift to a state pac, which he really

started to ramp up last year, makes you wonder

if he's thinking about running for

an office here in the state. Specifically, Governor

Chaffetz loves to flirt with the idea of running

for governor. He was mentioned as

someone who was lying it in 2020 and then

again in 2024. That makes some sense. He

started his political career running the campaign

of John Huntsman Jr. When he first ran for

governor and then he was his first chief of staff before he

go run for Congress when he defeated Chris

Cannon. The advantage of moving to a state

pack for Chaffetz allows him to take

unlimited donations into that

entity. Uh, a federal PAC, you're limited to a

$5,000 donation from an

Individual in Utah, there are no limits. You

can give however much you want to whoever you

want. In fact, last year, he pulled in some pretty big

donations. He got $20,000 from

George Glass, who was the ambassador to

Port Portugal in the first Trump administration. And

now he is Trump's nominee to be ambassador to

Japan. That's a $20,000 donation.

He got another $20,000 from David

Lizzenby, who started the For Life Research

MLM. $10,000 from Kevin

Pritchett, who owns King's Camo here in Utah. And

Trump's former National security advisor, Robert O' Brien shipped in

$5,000. That's all last year. And he's

given out some money to local

Republican candidates, which is one of the

main reasons why you have. Although, as I said,

most of the money he's been spending over the past few years has been on

administrative costs. During the 2024

cycle, he gave just $5,000 total

to Utah's congressional delegation through

his federal PAC. $5,000.

Overall, Senator Mike Lee got the most at $2,000, and

he wasn't even up for election. In fact, the only person he

did not give money to was Blake Moore. The

state PAC gave about $4,700 to

various state and local candidates and some

local county Republican parties. So ch

raise a lot more money from less people

through the state pack, and he'll still be able to donate

to federal candidates using his state pac.

The limits of what he can give will still

apply, but he can take in more money. And if

he pulls the trigger and decides to run for governor in

2028, he can take that money and then transfer it

over to a campaign account. So there's not a lot of downside.

The only negative for him is this would take a federal

run for him off the top table. When he was in the House, he

mused about possibly running for U.S. senate when

Orin Hatch retired. Uh, that never happened.

Moving his money from the federal PAC to the state PAC means he would have to

start over if he wanted to run for a federal office,

because you cannot take state money and transfer it

to a federal campaign account. But you can take federal

money and transfer it to a state account here in

Utah, so it can flow only one way. Now,

Chaffetz might have a hard time running for

governor. If you remember in 2017, he had

just won reelection. And then he shocked

everybody by announcing that he was stepping down, that he

was retiring. He ended up getting a job with

Fox News. And I ran into him earlier this year

at the Salt Lake County Republican convention. And

he's, he's got a great gig. That is a

really good gig. He was a little bit haggard because

he said he had to get up, uh, early in the morning for a Fox News

hit. But it's a pretty great gig.

He's on Fox News, he's authored some best

selling books, he hosts a podcast that's

actually pretty good. I've listened to a number of episodes and it'

not a bad show. So you have to wonder why

he would want to run and he would have a hard time convincing

voters that he wouldn't quit on them again. Because he

did quit in 2017

triggered the first special election in the state

in almost a hundred years. That was the one that was won

by then Provo Mayor John

Curtis, who went into Congress and now

Curtis is in the U.S. senate. So that's a big

hurdle. And I don't know if Chaffetz would do that, but at least

he made a move that makes running for

governor in 2028 at least a

little more likely. You'll remember Governor Spencer Cox said

he's not going to run for reelection in 2028, so

this will be his last term in the Governor's mansion. It's going to be

an open race and the Republican primary race for the nomination

could be a knockdown drag out. There are a lot of people

looking at it. We know that Phil Lyman says he's going to

run again. It's pretty clear that House

Speaker Mike Schultz is planning on running

for governor in 2020. Chaffetz

gets in the race. That would be an interesting addition. And then you'll

see a few other people you're not even thinking of try to

jump in. So 2028 is going to be

a wild election year here in the state

with an open governor's race. Could we see Chaffetz?

I don't know.

But this move made it at least a little more likely.

So we all know that Senator Mike Lee is buddies

with Elon Musk. They interact all the time on

Twitter, been photographed together.

They've spent some time together. Senator Mike Lee, when

he launched his based Mike Lee

Twitter account back in 2022, he

spent a lot of time tweeting at

Elon Musk just hoping to get his attention. He

finally did. Leon Musk. I don't know how much they actually hang out,

but they interact online all the time.

And that's why I wanted to talk about this story. There was an

article in the Wall Street Journal this week.

I don't know if you saw it, but it is super

gross. The headline is the tactics Elon

Musk uses to manage his, quote,

legion of babies and their

mother. And I felt like I needed to take a

shower after this story. We all

know that Musk has at least 14 children

with four women. That includes the pop musician

Grimes. There's Chavon Zillis, who was an executive

at his brain chip implant

company, Neuralink. The most recent one was concert

conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair.

But this article says that there are people close

to Musk who believe the true number of his children

is much higher than we even

know. And in this article, it talks about how

Musk basically uses X

Twitter, the social media platform that he

turned into a cesspool, in order to approach

women and ask them if they would like to

have his babies. This article is just

all kinds of gross. Musk refers to his

office offspring as a legion, which is a

reference to the ancient military units that could

be thousands of soldiers. When Musk

was dating St. Clair, he wanted to have

as many babies as quickly as possible. So he

suggests they hired surrogates so that they

could have more babies together as quick

as possible. In fact, one of the text messages the Wall

Street Journal saw from Musk said, to

reach legion level before the

apocalypse, we will need to use

surrogates. Musk believes that

civilization is going to collapse because

of population decline. Birth rates are

going down across the world, and he wants to

correct that by, quote, helping

seed the earth with more human beings of

high intelligence, which just so happened to be his

offspring. Bleh. You've probably heard of the

pronatalism movement where people say

civilization will crumble if people don't start having more

children. In fact, in 2019, long

before he was a professional Twitter troll, Senator

Mike Lee went to the Senate floor and said

that the solution to fixing climate change

is for people to fall in love,

get married, and have some kids.

Because he says if m. If you make more people,

that means more markets for more innovation

and more babies. Means people will be looking

towards the future and they'll want to solve climate change. So

Lee was a proto pro

natalist before the IDE idea

started to gain traction on the right

now. One of the weird things about pronatalism is that

the people who believe in it want to implement government

policies and cultural solutions to

fix the problem for people to have

more babies. Of course, that doesn't mean anything like,

you know, making it so people can afford homes

or reducing the risks of climate change.

No, none of that is what we really want to do. We just want to

find ways to, to have more kids. In one part of

this article, it talks about how there was a

cryptocurrency influencer named Tiffany Fong,

um, and she was covering the downfall of crypto

tycoon Sam Bankman Fried. When

Musk started liking and replying to

her posts on Twitter. And

her interactions went through the roof because

Musk has more than 200 million

followers, almost 220 million followers.

And so she started getting more attention

and, and that led to her making money on

social media. In fact, she apparently made like

$21,000 in one two week period

because of her interactions with Musk. And

right about that time is when Musk sent her a direct

message asking if she was interested in

having his child. Kind of direct. I don't know if that's the

approach that I would use, but again, then, I'm not the richest

man in the world. Now. Fong didn't

take him up on his offer because she

wants to have children in a more traditional way,

is what she. But she was worried that turning him

down was going to hurt her earnings. And

once Musk found out that Fong had told people about

his request, he unfollowed her

and her engagement dropped a ton. In

2023, Musk started dating St. Clair. And

you'll remember her, she's the one who started a huge firestorm

over this when she was trying to get Musk

to acknowledge, uh, the paternity of their

child together. And she was working for the

deeply unfunny Babylon Bee at the time or

the company that owns Babylon Bee. And he frequently

talked about having children. St Clair was the person

who had the custom made black Make America

great again hat that Musk was wearing that was

in the gothic font that he wore all the time in the

later stages of the campaign. She was the one who made that for

him. He wore it everywhere. This article is just

chock full of gross little details here.

It says in November, Musk responded to a

selfie that St. Clair sent him by

texting back, I want to knock you up again.

You should go read it. It talks about the lengths that

Musk goes to to keep the number of children

secret so that they don't get a lot of attention, they don't put

his name on the birth certificate when they're born.

Um, he really just wants no public acknowledgment that he

is their father. Right now, as I said, we know about

14 of them, but people close to Musk say it's a lot

more. And I think it's relevant to talk about this article

because of just how close he is to Senator Mike

Lee. Because you know what they say, you are the

company you keep.

Before we go, I'd like to remind you once

again, as I do every week, to subscribe to this

podcast. If you already haven't subscribe to the show.

Wherever you get your podcasts and if you have a moment, leave us a

rating and review. It's the best way to get more

listeners for the show. And also you can sign up

for my newsletter@ah, UT

politicalwatch.net news. It's absolutely

free. You'll get every story that I write delivered

directly to your email inbox.

And as you know, I am an independent journalist here in

Utah. My my boss is you, my boss

is my subscribers. And you

can support this work by becoming one of those paid subscribers.

It's as little as $5 a month. Uh, I've

mentioned it before, but this work takes time and

resources. You know, I have to pay for things like web

hosting, podcast hosting, the equipment to do this. But

podcast. Just last week I had to pay

for a copy of Kevin Freeman's book

about using gold as a

transactional system. You'll find that in one of my stories from

the past week explaining the insane

conspiracy theory that is the

underpinning of this book. I had to pay for that. If I

could do this for free, I would because I love it so much. But I

can't. So that's why I have to rely on subscribers

like you to keep this going, to keep doing what I'm doing.

So if you can, if you feel like you can swing it a

$5 subscription, just go to my website, UtahPolitical

Watch News. Or you can leave a one time donation. I do have a tip

jar there. If you have a business and you would like to

sponsor this show, sponsor the podcast.

Let's talk. You can find my email linked in the

show notes and if you have any feedback

or suggestions about the show, if there's a topic you

want to hear, complaints, comments,

hate mail. If there's a guest you'd like to hear from,

you can also email me as well. My email again is in the

show notes. That's going to do it for this week. Thank you

so much for listening and we'll do it again soon.

320,000 is a LOT of signatures
Broadcast by