Sen. Mike Lee - the Jar Jar Binks of Congress
>> Bryan Schott: Foreign.
This is special session. I'm your host, Bryan Schott.
You know, we may be in the midst of a global
economic meltdown, but news about
Utah politics just does not stop.
So I'm glad to have you on board. You do
realize that we're living out the plot
of the Star wars film the Phantom Menace in
real time, right? Just go look at the opening crawl
of the movie. It says, turmoil has engulfed
the Galactic Republic. The taxation of trade
routes to outlying star systems is in
dispute. Hoping to resolve the matter with a
blockade of deadly battleships, the greedy
trade federation has stopped all shipping to the
small planet of Naboo. While the Congress of
the Republic endlessly debates this alarming
chain of events, the Supreme Chancellor has
secretly dispatched two Jedi Knights, the
guardians of peace and justice in the galaxy, to
settle the conflict. That sounds a h*** of a lot like what's going
on right now. The only thing I don't know is who those
Jedi Knights who were secretly dispatched to
resolve the conflict would be. Maybe that hasn't happened yet.
Now, I have been spending way too much time thinking about this,
and I believe that there's an argument to be made
that in this real life version of the Phantom
Menace, Jar Jar Binks is Utah
Senator Mike Lee. Hear me out. Jar Jar
was an outcast from the Gungan society. He was
clumsy, he was annoying, nobody liked him. But he was able
to return to favor after he helped to
create an alliance between the Gungans and
Queen Amidala's people. Lee was on the
fringes of the Senate GOP tried to stop
Donald Trump from becoming the party's nominee
for president, but. But then switched
his tune, has become one of Trump's biggest
cheerleaders, and has returned to favor
in the national gop. Here's where this analogy
really fits, and you have to go forward into later
movies. If you remember, in episode three, Emperor
Palpatine was. He manipulated Jar
Jar to propose that he be given
emergency executive powers, and
that led to the dissolution of the Republic
and the rise of the Empire. He used these
emergency powers to give himself total
power. And if you haven't put it together yet, Donald Trump would be
Emperor Palpatine in this scenario. But he used these
emergency powers to give himself total
power and dissolve the Republic. In the lead
up to January 6, Lee worked
overtime to try to find a way to make Trump's attempt to
overthrow an election fit with the
Constitution. That sounds kind of the same
thing. And he's currently attacking
judges who dare to oppose Trump
and Palpatine. I think the analogy fits, but I won't
belabor the point anymore. Anyway, let's get to the top news from the
last week.
We're still on hold waiting to hear whether or
not the Republican controlled legislature is going to try to
override any of Governor Spencer Cox's vetoes
from the 2025 legislature. One of the vetoes that might
get overridden is HB306 that was sponsored
by Representative Ken Ivory. And what that does is
it allows the state or it authorizes the
state to hire a company
to set up a system that would enable the state
to pay vendors using gold if
that's how those vendors wanted to be paid. Right now
Utah already holds about $60 million in
gold purchased over the last year
because of another bill sponsored by
Representative Ken Ivory. Governor Spencer
Cox, when he vetoed the bill, said that hiring a vendor
to come up with a system that would be able to integrate with the
state's accounting system was a
really complicated propos and that's why he vetoed
it. House leadership has already polled members on which bills they
want to override and I'm told that they have enough votes to
override the veto on this bill. We won't know
about the Senate. Senate President Stuart Adams has been
traveling apparently and will poll his
membership next week. And if they can get 2/3 in the
Senate, well then they'll probably try to override this
bill. There is a big push from right wing groups like the
Utah Eagle Forum, the Utah Citizens for the
Constitution. They really want this veto
overridden. Also, when he vetoed the, Cox
said he was worried about how much it was going to cost
to set up this system. The legislature did not
fund this bill, but Ivory
has said that there's a private donor
who's offered to cover the
$147,000 to hire this
vendor to come up with a system. That private vendor is a
guy named Kevin Freeman and he hosts
a podcast called Economic War Room. And here's
what you need to know about him. Freeman is a right
wing personality. He's really gone in on this
who using gold as legal tender. And
in fact he wrote a book about it and the book is called
Pirate Discovering the Founders
Hidden Plan for Economic justice and
Defeating the Great Reset. In his book, Freeman
claims that the Founding Fathers hid a clause in the
Constitution that allows states to use
pirate money, which would be gold bullion
as currency. That theory might sound a little bit
out there, but considering the time that the Constitution was
written, it makes sense. I mean h***, we even Got
Sen. Mike Lee talking about
authorizing piracy through marks of
reprisal to fight the cartel. So, you
know, in context, it makes sense. But
when you look at the title of Freeman's book a little bit
closer, there's something that jumped out at me, and it's the word Great
Reset. And if you don't know what the Great Reset is,
it is a conspiracy theory that global
elites used the Coronavirus
pandemic. They manufactured the pandemic, and they're
using it to dismantle the US Economy
so that they can redistribute wealth to bring
about radical social change.
And Freeman and his followers want
to get back to the gold standard, and their
end game is replacing the Federal Reserve
completely because we're going back to the gold standard.
All of our money is backed by gold. Freeman is
going around the country lobbying state
legislatures to make this move.
He's pushed it in Texas. He tried it in
Louisiana. Louisiana lawmakers rejected
what he was trying to do because they
didn't buy into the conspiracy theory that is at
the heart of this book. The book is not about the
Constitution saying you can use gold
as currency. The book is about this
conspiracy theory, the Great Reset, that there's
some overarching plans, that there is some secret
cabal of global elites, and they are plotting
they manufactured the Coronavirus pandemic,
or they saw an opportunity with the COVID
pandemic to crash the global
economy, redistribute wealth, and then they're gonna rule over
everything. That's what is at the center of this
book. And you've got Utah lawmakers buying into
it hook, line, and sinker. He was the inspiration
for Ivory's bill last year that allowed the state to
invest in gold. It's a hedge against inflation and
economic uncertainty. Well, maybe it's also
fueled by this absolutely bonkers
conspiracy theory that Klaus Schwab and
his minions are trying to take over the
world. So you have to understand where this
bill came from. The House has enough votes
to override the veto. I suspect the Senate will
get there, too. There's a lot of lobbying going on right now.
Freeman sent a video address to
the Utah Eagle Forum's 2024 convention
right before they initially passed the bill allowing
the state to invest in gold. So, on
the surface, this kind of sounds good.
Freeman and his supporters, like Ken
Ivory, say that we want to use it as
a hedge against infl. And it's a hedge against
economic uncertainty. But they want to get the US
Back on the gold standard. The United States
abandoned the gold standard after the
Great Depression because
there can be some volatility in the markets. I mean,
gold went above $3,100
this week in response to President
Trump's tariffs. And it also severely
restrains what governments are able to do
because they only have a fixed amount of
money to spend. You can only spend what you have,
your gold reserve, rather than what
we do now, which is the government can print its own
currency. So you have to understand where this stuff
is coming from. It's based on a conspiracy
theory, and I'm guessing that the legislature
is going to override this veto.
Boy, it was a fun week for the Utah Board of Education.
They discussed and ultimately
rejected a resolution to remove
DEI from schools, claiming that it was,
quote, attempting to achieve the Soviet
communist goal of actual equality.
The resolution failed in a vote of 10 to
4 after a lot of pushback from
the public. Now, it's a resolution, it's not a rule. It
doesn't carry the same legal authority, but this is the kind of
thing that Republicans love to
do. If you ever have the opportunity to
sit through a Republican state central
committee meeting, and I don't recommend that you do, but if
you ever want to, there's a lot of fighting about
resolutions. They propose resolutions for pretty
much anything and everything. After the
legislature changed the state flag, the Republican Party
passed a resolution opposing the move. A lot
of times the people who support these resolutions, who
vote in favor of them, think that it should be
treated like the word of God, like the
resolution should be the same as
a. A law. Well, they passed a resolution, so we
shouldn't do that or we should do this. And that's just not the way it works.
The resolution is just a position statement. It's how this
organization feels on something, and you
can take it or you can leave it. The legislature passes
resolutions all the time, and most of them
really don't do anything. Occasionally, they'll put stuff on the
ballot, but for the most part, they don't really do anything.
It's just a statement of how they're feeling, vibes,
if you will. So this resolution eliminated all
DEI from public education in the state
because it was aligned with communist Russia,
which is not true. And you gotta love the fact that the people
who are in charge of our public education
can't be bothered to Google something. I
suspect that if you asked them to define dei,
they wouldn't be able to tell you what it is. The draft of the
resolution said that DEI came from Soviet
Russia as part of a communist effort. To
achieve equality. But that's just not true.
And at the end of the day, the state Board of Education wasted a
bunch of time debating this. The other thing that they
did this week, the board also rejected
a proposal to send a letter
to President Donald Trump, patting him on the back,
saying attaboy for dismantling the US
Department of Education. That proposal was also
shot down on a 10 to 4 vote. There was one
line in the letter that said, we intend to
pursue a revenue plan free of
federal funding and ask that you join us in championing these
endeavors within our state and beyond.
That is a dream of some hardcore conservatives in Utah to just
completely disconnect the state from any sort of
federal funding. And they take great pride
in the fact that Utah is one of the few Republican
states that actually gives more to the federal
government than it takes in in federal funds.
And there are benefits to that. You're not at the
whims of the federal government. But. But a lot of board
members in this discussion were worried that the
state would never replace the federal funding for
education if that were to happen. Utah gets about 11%
of its budget for education from the federal government.
Most of that goes towards special education and
for student meals. At the end of the day, they voted that
proposal down as well and wasted more time on
the proposal. Your government in action, folks.
There was a report that came out this week about
some of the activities of Representative
Celeste Malloy before she was elected to Congress
that raised some eyebrows and some of this we knew before,
but it's still very interesting to put
it all into context. As you know,
Malloy rocketed out of nowhere in
2023. She was a staffer for
Representative Chris Stewart and came out of
nowhere after he announced his surprise
retirement. She was able to win special
election to replace him and then was elected to a full term
last year. Before she was in Congress, Malloy was an
attorney in Washington County. She worked on public
lands issues, and she was also on
the board of directors for a group called the foundation
for Integrated resource management, or
firm. And she joined in
2018. In the two years prior to that,
2016 and 2017, the Utah
legislature gave firm
$400,000 and the money was to fund
lawsuits challenging federal control of
public lands. FIRM never filed a
lawsuit. We don't know what happened with that
money. There was actually an ethics
complaint filed by the Campaign for Accountability
with the Internal Revenue Service and the Utah Division of
Consumer Protection that really went nowhere. But
it's $400,000 that just vanished.
And Malloy Was on the board of directors for this
group. Malloy joined the board of directors for firm in
2018. Those were the years after the legislature gave
them money. So she wasn't there when they got the money,
but she was there when they failed to
file lawsuits with it. But also in
2018, she helped firm start
another organization called the rural policy
and public lands Institute, or rppl.
And that organization was part of
then Dixie state University, which is now Utah
Tech University, and that's where it was going to be housed.
And she lobbied the Utah legislature in
2019 for $300,000
to help fund this organization. They were
supposed to conduct research related to public
lands. According to some business records filed with the
state of Utah that I dug up, Malloy was one of the founders
when they started in 2018 and
2019. Updated business filings show that
she became the president of the organization. Now,
in 2019, Malloy successfully
lobbied Utah lawmakers to give this organization
3. And that money was supposed to,
quote, conduct high quality research on
issues relevant to rural policy and public
lands research, and was also supposed to
train the next generation of rural policy experts
through an active program of student development and
training. There's really not a lot of evidence of
what RPPL did with that money either.
After getting that $300,000, it took some
digging, but I discovered that in
2019, RPPL helped
a coalition of local governments, mostly in
Colorado, secure a $200,000
matching federal grant that was used
to diversify the coal industry in
northwestern Colorado and eastern
Utah. And that grant led to the
publication of something called the coal innovation
playbook, which came out in
2022. You can't really find that
document anywhere online anymore, but. But
archived copies are available on the
wayback machine online. And so we
don't really know what happened with that money. I
mean, if you break it down,
firm, this organization that she joined in
2018, they got
$400,000 from the Utah
legislature to file lawsuits against the
federal government. They never did a d*** thing or
gave back any of the money. Malloy joined them in
2018. Then they helped
her, a separate organization in 2019
to do research. I'm assuming it's for the
parent organization, firm. The legislature
gave her new entity $300,000, and the
only result is a matching grant for
$200,000. And then
that new organization, RPPL, it was dissolved when
she decided to run for office. What happened to that money?
We don't know. Just like we don't know what happened with the $400,000
that lawmakers gave the parent organization
Firmed Malloy. Ever since she's been in office,
there's been like a history of weird stuff about
her background or in the way that she's
operated. When she ran for office, her
registration as a member of the Republican Party in
Utah was inactive because she did not live here.
Her address was in Virginia because she was working in
Congress. She only reactivated her voter
registration as a Republican after the
lieutenant governor's office warned her. And that was after
filing was closed. There were lawsuits about this.
Nothing ever came of it. But that was one of the first strange
things. And she's also the first cousin of
Ammon Bundy, you know, the guy who helped take
over the wildlife refuge in Oregon, and
his father had a standoff with federal
agents at his ranch in Nevada.
Her mother is sisters with Cliven Bundy's
second wife. So Ammon Bundy is her cousin. That's a
fact that she really didn't publicize until I was
one of the reporters who helped to first report
that. And then there's this story where she was part of an organization
that took $400,000 from the legislature and
apparently didn't do a d*** thing with it and then
formed a second organization, got $300,000 from the
legislature. And we don't know what happened with that money
either. Guess we gotta do some digging to find out.
On Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary
RFK Jr will be in Utah
to praise the state for adopting a
SL bills that are part of his Make America healthy again
or MAHA movement. If you'll remember, the legislature
passed HB 81, which banned
fluoride in public drinking water systems.
They also passed
HB402. Public schools can no longer
serve food with certain food dyes in them and other
additives. And HB403,
which restricts Utahns from using SNAP
benefits to purchase candy and
soda. And those initiatives are all part of
Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again movement. We'll also have
Lee Zeldin, administrator of the U.S. environmental Protection
Agency, as part of this press conference. We all
know about the fluoride issue I talked about in last week's podcast about
how most Utahns are opposed to removing
fluoride from the drinking water. But the other two bills
that they're going to highlight came from
Representative Christian Chevrier. And if you don't
know who she is, you probably should. Chevrea
is an anti vaccine activist. She
started gaining some prominence during the COVID
pandemic. She had an organization called Vaccine
Free Utah. That really was sort of a fringe group
until the COVID pandemic hit in Utah. And
then her public profile started to
grow significantly, as you can
imagine. And a lot of her beliefs are founded in
conspiracy theories, anti vaccine conspiracy theories.
So of course she's going to align a lot
with what Kennedy is doing now. These bills to
remove certain food dyes in them from public school
food and restricting Utahs from using
SNAP to purchase candy and soda, those are probably good
ideas and they're probably some of the more
normal things that she has advocated for
in the past. But she is solidly
on the far right of Utah's political
spectrum. How did she get in office? Well, she
won a special election to replace
Representative Brady Brammer, who won a special
election to replace Senator Mike Kennedy in
the Senate. And so she only had to convince a
handful of delegates in Utah county to elect
her to that seat. And she's going to hold it for at least two years and
then she'll be the incumbent when the 2026 elections
roll around. And she is a product of the
Republican caucus and convention system in
which only Republican delegates choose the
replacements for lawmakers who resign
their seats in the middle of the term. And I
wrote about this earlier, but if you look at what happened with Brady
Brammer's seat where he is now in the Senate replacing
Mike Kennedy In 2024, Brammer was reelected
to his seat in HD54. He
resign after he won the election to replace Kennedy. And
that's how Chevalier won his seat. But let's
look at that Senate seat that Brammer assumed
from Kennedy. Brammer needed 171
votes, that's it. To win that seat. And
he was the sixth straight lawmaker
to be initially appointed to that
seat rather than an open election. The last
time that that particular seat in the Senate, now
there's been redistricting, but that particular seat in
the Senate the last time time it was part
of an open election where there was a vacancy during
a regular election was more than 40
years ago. So Brammer was appointed to
replace Kennedy. Kennedy in
2021 was appointed to that seat to
replace Dan Hemmert. Hemmert
was appointed to that seat in
2019 when Al
Jackson resigned because he took a job in another
state. State. Al Jackson was appointed to
that seat in 2014 after
former Senator John Valentine
was picked to chair the Utah State
Tax Commission. John Valentine was a
member of the Utah House of Representatives
when he was appointed to replace Craig Peterson
in 1998. Peterson was
appointed to that seat in the Utah Senate in
1988 to replace
Republican Paul Rogers. And
Rogers was the last Republican elected to
that particular seat in an open election.
Every other time, the vacancy was filled by a
special election and decided by delegates. And
that's why Republican delegates are fighting so hard to
save the caucus convention system, because they have a
lot of power over who fills those seats
in a vacancy.
This is an interesting story. I don't know how much impact it's going to
have on Utah's political landscape, but we found out this
week that the United Utah Party, which has been around since
2017, and the Utah Forward Party, which
fielded candidates for the first time in the 2024
election, they're going to be merging or they've. They've got a
proposal to merge on the table. If you look
at the voter registration numbers, United Utah Party has
about 2200 people and the Utah Forward
Party has 200 members. The Utah Forward
Party is part of the National Forward, which was founded by
Andrew Yang in 2022. And they made a little bit
of news earlier this year when State Senator
Daniel Thatcher, on the final day of the 2025
session, renounced his membership in the
Republican Party and became a member of the Forward Party.
So he's the first elected official of the Forward Party in the state
of Utah. So if the merger goes through, you'll have about
2,400 members in this party, and that will
mean the Green Party will now be the smallest party in the
state. They've got about 600 people. As I said, the United Utah
Party's been around since their first
candidate was Jim Bennett, the son of former U.S.
senator Bob Bennett. He ran as the party's
nominee in the special election to replace Jason
Chaffetz. They've had very limited
success since 2017.
In 2020, Bryan Fabby ran for state
auditor and he finished in second place behind
John Dougal. But there was no Democrat in the
race. He. He got 13% of the vote,
which was 62 points behind Dougal.
Last year, Michelle Quist ran for Attorney
General as the UUP nominee. She finished in third
place and got just over 7% of the vote. It remains
to be seen how much of an appetite there really is for a
third party. Utah is Republican
dominated. If you look at those voter registration numbers,
Republicans, the biggest political party in Utah,
followed by unaffiliated voters, and then the
Democrats. And Even if the two
parties merge, their 2,400 members are going
to equal about
1/1 all the registered
voters in the state. Realistically, it's going to be
very hard for this new merged party to gain any
sort of traction. That's just the way it works. It's
really hard to get voters to abandon the two
party system because they haven't won
anything. That's your switched parties. He had already
won an election and he's not running for reelection when his
term is up next year. So the reality of the situation
is it's going to be really difficult for them to
get any sort of traction. Maybe they'll get a boost from their
convention. Former New Jersey Governor Christine
Todd Whitman, who is the co founder of
the Forward Party, she's scheduled to be the keynote speaker at that.
Maybe they'll get a little bit of a boost, but they've still got a
huge hill to climb if they want to become
relevant. They're behind a bunch of other parties, the
Constitution Party, the Independent American Party, the
Libertarians. They wish they were the Libertarian
Party in Utah right now and they're not close. We'll see
what happens. But the cynical in me says don't hold, hold your breath.
I'm sure there's a lot more that we could talk about, but we're gonna leave it
there for this week. Before we go, I'd like to remind
you to subscribe to this podcast if you already
haven't and leave us a rating and review wherever you can,
Apple Podcast or wherever you get your podcast. That
just helps the algorithm. Suggest this show to more
listeners. And more listeners means more support.
So if you could do that, I'd really appreciate. Appreciate it. Remember to sign up for
my newsletter at Utah Political Watch
News. That's absolutely free. If you do
appreciate what I do and you want to be come a
supporter, help me create more journalism, more podcasts like
this, you can become a paid subscriber for as little as
$5 a month. Being an independent journalist like I am,
that takes time and resources and I can't
do it for free. I'd love to be able to do it for free, but I can.
So I have to depend on
supporters and subscribers to keep doing what
I'm doing. That's just the reality of it. So if you
can swing a subscription, I would really appreciate it.
If you're a local business that would like to support or
sponsor this podcast, let's talk. My email
is linked in the show notes. I'd love to hear from you. If you
have feedback on the show or questions, complaints,
hate mail, a guest you'd like to hear. I'd love
to hear from you too. You can also hit me up at my email, which is in
the show notes. That's going to do it for this week. Thank
you so much for listening. We'll be back next week.
